Last visit was: Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:30 pm
It is currently Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:30 pm



 [ 4 posts ] 
Interesting 
Author Message
Rank 1 Paw
Rank 1 Paw

Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 9:07 am
Posts: 33
Post Interesting
http://www.dogbiteclaims.co.uk/dangerous-breeds.html Watch your feet and fingers if you see a woman walking her unmuzzled Dachshounds!!!!

_________________
democracy is not freedomImage


Sun Jun 06, 2010 10:24 am
Forum Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 5:55 pm
Posts: 114
Post Re: Interesting
Best thing to do is not to own a dog at all! I was at the Zoo just the other day, seen a few elephants, got out my dress makers tape measure, like the one Belfast City Council Dog Wardens use, measured one of these elephants and I couldn't believe my findings... Its of "Pit Bull Type" as it was well over the "Standards" so I think I will just have to report this dangerous dogephant to the council as it might be a danger to the public, looks nothing like a pit bull mind you but it measures up, thats good enough!

:lol:

_________________
Image


Mon Jun 07, 2010 2:27 pm WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 10:31 pm
Posts: 7
Post Re: Caroline Lennox's owner
Just to let you know I am going in for knee surgery tomorrow, so I won't be on for a few days, but I will update you on Lennox soon. Please keep supporting him while I am not on and spreading his story. Thanks again speak to you all soon . Caroline xx

_________________
Image


Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:47 pm WWW

Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Posts: 4
Post Re: Interesting
Admin wrote:
Best thing to do is not to own a dog at all! I was at the Zoo just the other day, seen a few elephants, got out my dress makers tape measure, like the one Belfast City Council Dog Wardens use, measured one of these elephants and I couldn't believe my findings... Its of "Pit Bull Type" as it was well over the "Standards" so I think I will just have to report this dangerous dogephant to the council as it might be a danger to the public, looks nothing like a pit bull mind you but it measures up, thats good enough!

:lol:


just some useful info for you.


A COMPARISON OF VISUAL AND DNA IDENTIFICATION OF BREEDS OF DOGS!

We are all aware of the newspaper articles, magazine stories, and TV segments that
show pictures of dogs and then reveal DNA breed analyses of the dogs. Surprise – the
DNA results are not what were expected based on the appearance of the dogs or the
owners’ beliefs. Those of us who walk through shelters and animal control facilities
compare the posted breed descriptions of the dogs to what they look like to us – with
frequent differences of opinions. Those who have worked at shelters and similar
facilities are aware that as dogs move through the steps in admission or during their
stay that their breed descriptions may change. It is my impression, when visiting
animal control or adoption agencies, that most medium to large size dogs with straight,
short/ medium length brown hair coats are cast as German shepherds or shepherd
mixes, dogs with a black spot on their tongues are designated Chow mixes , and most
medium sized, stocky, broad headed, small eared dogs with a short hair coats are pitbulls
or pit-bull mixes.

It is not easy to visually identify the breeds of dogs of unknown parentage accurately.
Sometimes dogs just don’t look like either parent. Scott and Fuller’s work on the
genetics and social behavior of dogs involved studying purebred dogs, F1 crosses of
purebreds, backcrosses and F2 crosses.1 Photographs of some of these F1 and F2
puppies depict that they do not resemble either purebred parent, nor do the
photographs of the F2 generations dogs look like their mixed breed parents. We don’t
know how many of the offspring did look like their purebred ancestors, but clearly not all
resembled parents or grandparents.

Shelter dog breed assignments may be based on what the dogs look like to someone at
the shelter or because owners relinquishing their dogs have indentified the dogs as a
specific breed. Newborn and young puppies may be identified as a certain breed
because the mother dog resembled a purebred dog. In the latter case, the sire of the
litter could have been any breed or several dogs could have fathered puppies in the
same litter. When the puppies grow up they don’t look anything like their mother or
littermates. These breed or mixed breed identifications may eventually find their way
into data bases – be it through population data, dog bites, serious dog attacks, behavior
problems, or disease statistics.

Rarely are owners permitted to simply fill out forms that ask about the breed by only
stating that the dog is a mixed breed or of unknown parentage. If they do so, the followup
question often is “What is it mostly?”, or “What is its most predominant breed?”, or
“What does it look like mostly?” This information may be solicited by insurance
companies, landlords, housing associations, licensing agencies, mandatory dog bite
reports, veterinary medical records, the media, and researchers trying to determine the
likelihood of involvement of specific breeds in study populations. For example, in the
methodology of one elegantly designed study, owners were asked “ what breed they
considered their dog: if more than one breed was specified, they were asked which
breed they considered to be predominant.” 2 This article became part of the impetus for
many recommendations and restrictions intended to reduce dog bites.
High profile articles in JAMA and JAVMA have reported dog bite fatalities and listed
breeds involved in such attacks. 3,4 The data used was obtained by “combining data
from the National Center for Health Statistics and computerized searching of news
stories. Karen Delise has presented compelling arguments in her recent book, The Pit
Bull Placebo, that undermines conclusions and implications of these reports. 5,6
A short report in press in the Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science indicates low
agreement between the identification of breeds of dogs by adoption agencies and DNA
identification .7 The dogs in this study were of unknown parentage and had been
acquired from adoption agencies. In only a quarter of these dogs was at least one of
the breeds proposed by the adoption agencies also detected as a predominant breed
by DNA analysis. (Predominant breeds were defined as those comprised of the highest
percentage of a DNA breed make-up.) In 87.5% of the adopted dogs, breeds were
identified by DNA analyses that were not proposed by the adoption agencies. A breed
must have been detected at a minimum of 12.5% of a dog’s make-up to be reported in
the DNA analysis.

Reports of DNA analyses of percentages of purebred dog breed ancestry, while
accurate most of the time, are not infallible. The laboratories providing such analyses
may have qualifiers in their reports stating that there is an 85% or 90% validity of the
results and indicate which results have lower confidence levels. Different testing
laboratories may report different results depending on which dogs were used to develop
their standards and how the laboratories analyze the samples 8 As the tests are refined,
the same laboratory may report slightly different results at different points in time.
The discrepancy between breed identifications based on opinion and DNA analysis , as
well as concerns about reliability of data collected based on media reports, draws into
question the validity and enforcement of public and private polices pertaining to dog
breeds.

Dr Amy Marder, Animal Rescue League of Boston and Director for the Center for
Shelter Dogs, has proposed that dogs adopted from shelters in the U.S. simply be
identified as “American Shelter Dogs”. This might solve a lot of problems, as well as
promote pride and ownership of an “American Shelter Dog.”


Sat Jun 26, 2010 12:21 am
 [ 4 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alexa [Bot] and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Hosted By C-Tech Web Hosting © 2011 The Save Lennox Campaign.
Designed By C-Tech.